23ISO 25000-23Part 23 measurement record

Home / The record / 6.10 Safety measures

ISO/IEC DIS 25000-23.2, 6.10.2 ยท Heading only

6.10.2 Operational constraint measures

Operational constraint asks whether the product respects the conditions it must operate within. A measure relates constraint violations to the operating period or the operations observed.

The free preview lists this heading and its subheadings but not the requirement text. This page states what the heading requires in our words and never invents the wording.

Not legal advice; does not certify. This page states our reading of a public draft, not the standard's wording, and it is not an official interpretation.

What this heading covers

A constraint is a limit the product must not cross: a speed, a dose, a temperature, a concurrent user count, a data retention period. The measure is a count of violations or a proportion of operations within limits. The constraints have to come from the hazard analysis or the domain, not from the product's current behaviour, because a product that has always exceeded a limit has not defined it. The measure should record the operating envelope and what happens at the boundary.

Record position: family 36 of 40 in clause 6, under 6.10 Safety, which carries 5 families. It is one of the 40 families a programme has to map its measures to, and its elements are listed below. The heading is 6.10.2 in the public contents; the text behind it is not public.

How a measure for this family is built

Count the operations within the stated constraints as the numerator over the operations observed. Report violations by constraint and by consequence. For a boundary measure, test the value just inside and just outside the limit, because that is where the constraint is decided.

Our worked formula

Operations within the stated constraints divided by operations observed, with violations by constraint and consequence.

Measure elements that can feed it

Number of events, Number of input conditions, Duration

Chosen by us from the thirty-one quality measure elements named in Annex B. The draft does not publish which elements feed operational constraint, so the choice above is a worked example, not the draft's assignment.

What to put in place before publication

  1. Source each constraint from a hazard analysis or a domain rule.
  2. Test at the boundary, not only in the comfortable middle.

Evidence to keep

KindWhat it looks like
Constraint listEach constraint, its source, its limit and its consequence
Boundary testThe values tested at and beyond the limit, and the product behaviour

The test a reviewer asks

  • Does every constraint name its source and its consequence?
  • Is the boundary behaviour recorded?

Two questions to ask

  • Where does each constraint come from: a hazard analysis, a domain rule or the current configuration?
  • What happens at the boundary, and was it tested from both sides?

Where teams usually fall short

  • A constraint inferred from the current configuration, so the product can never violate it by definition.

What the number cannot tell you

It cannot tell you whether the constraints were complete. A constraint set from the wrong hazard analysis measures the wrong envelope.

What happens next

Risk identification is the family that asks whether the product can see a hazard developing.

Source

ISO Online Browsing Platform, free preview of ISO/IEC DIS 25000-23.2 https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso-iec:25000:-23:dis:ed-1:v2:en read 22 October 2026

ISO/IEC 25010:2023, Product quality model https://www.iso.org/standard/78176.html read 22 October 2026

ISO/IEC 25023:2016, Measurement of system and software product quality https://www.iso.org/standard/35747.html read 22 October 2026

The rules this is built from

Read from the real rules, not invented.

This page is read from the public record for 6.10.2: the heading in the free contents, and where public, the text the preview carries.

  • Read from the real rules
  • 63 record pages behind it
  • 116 public headings checked
  • Check any line yourself

The measure set is read from the public contents; the model table is read from the public 25010:2023 model. Where the draft text is not public, the page says so instead of filling the gap.

Nothing here is guessed while you wait. Each page is written from the public record and points to the exact page it came from. Record updated 22 October 2026