What this heading covers
A constraint is a limit the product must not cross: a speed, a dose, a temperature, a concurrent user count, a data retention period. The measure is a count of violations or a proportion of operations within limits. The constraints have to come from the hazard analysis or the domain, not from the product's current behaviour, because a product that has always exceeded a limit has not defined it. The measure should record the operating envelope and what happens at the boundary.
Record position: family 36 of 40 in clause 6, under 6.10 Safety, which carries 5 families. It is one of the 40 families a programme has to map its measures to, and its elements are listed below. The heading is 6.10.2 in the public contents; the text behind it is not public.
How a measure for this family is built
Count the operations within the stated constraints as the numerator over the operations observed. Report violations by constraint and by consequence. For a boundary measure, test the value just inside and just outside the limit, because that is where the constraint is decided.
Our worked formula
Operations within the stated constraints divided by operations observed, with violations by constraint and consequence.
Measure elements that can feed it
Number of events, Number of input conditions, Duration
Chosen by us from the thirty-one quality measure elements named in Annex B. The draft does not publish which elements feed operational constraint, so the choice above is a worked example, not the draft's assignment.
What to put in place before publication
- Source each constraint from a hazard analysis or a domain rule.
- Test at the boundary, not only in the comfortable middle.
Evidence to keep
| Kind | What it looks like |
|---|---|
| Constraint list | Each constraint, its source, its limit and its consequence |
| Boundary test | The values tested at and beyond the limit, and the product behaviour |
The test a reviewer asks
- Does every constraint name its source and its consequence?
- Is the boundary behaviour recorded?
Two questions to ask
- Where does each constraint come from: a hazard analysis, a domain rule or the current configuration?
- What happens at the boundary, and was it tested from both sides?
Where teams usually fall short
- A constraint inferred from the current configuration, so the product can never violate it by definition.
What the number cannot tell you
It cannot tell you whether the constraints were complete. A constraint set from the wrong hazard analysis measures the wrong envelope.
What happens next
Risk identification is the family that asks whether the product can see a hazard developing.
Source
ISO Online Browsing Platform, free preview of ISO/IEC DIS 25000-23.2 https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso-iec:25000:-23:dis:ed-1:v2:en read 22 October 2026
ISO/IEC 25010:2023, Product quality model https://www.iso.org/standard/78176.html read 22 October 2026
ISO/IEC 25023:2016, Measurement of system and software product quality https://www.iso.org/standard/35747.html read 22 October 2026