23ISO 25000-23Part 23 measurement record

Home / The record / 6.5 Interaction capability measures

ISO/IEC DIS 25000-23.2, 6.5.4 ยท Heading only

6.5.4 Operability measures

Operability asks how easily and reliably a user can operate the product once they know it. A measure relates successful operations to attempted operations, or effort to the task.

The free preview lists this heading and its subheadings but not the requirement text. This page states what the heading requires in our words and never invents the wording.

Not legal advice; does not certify. This page states our reading of a public draft, not the standard's wording, and it is not an official interpretation.

What this heading covers

Operability is the steady state. It covers the number of steps, the error rate, the consistency of the interaction and the physical effort. The measure should be taken from a task that represents normal work, with users who know the product, because otherwise it measures learning. A common failure is to measure the happy path only, where operability is highest and least informative. The measure should include recovery from an error, which is part of operating the product.

Record position: family 11 of 40 in clause 6, under 6.5 Interaction capability, which carries 8 families. It is one of the 40 families a programme has to map its measures to, and its elements are listed below. The heading is 6.5.4 in the public contents; the text behind it is not public.

How a measure for this family is built

Take the number of operations completed without error as the numerator over the operations attempted. Alternatively, count the steps or the time per task and compare with the target the requirements set. Record the task, the user group and the interface version, because all three change the result.

Our worked formula

Operations completed without error divided by operations attempted, or the median time per task against the requirement.

Measure elements that can feed it

Number of user operations, Number of user actions, Duration

Chosen by us from the thirty-one quality measure elements named in Annex B. The draft does not publish which elements feed operability, so the choice above is a worked example, not the draft's assignment.

What to put in place before publication

  1. Use tasks that represent normal work, not a demo path.
  2. Include an error and a recovery in the task set.

Evidence to keep

KindWhat it looks like
Task setThe representative tasks and the interface version
Operation logEach operation, its result and any error and recovery

The test a reviewer asks

  • Does the result name the interface version?
  • Are errors and recoveries counted, not only successful operations?

Two questions to ask

  • Which interface version do these operation results belong to?
  • Did the task set include an error and a recovery?

Where teams usually fall short

  • A time-on-task result from the product team, who designed the interface.

What the number cannot tell you

It cannot tell you whether the task was the right task. A well-operated interface on a badly designed task is still a product problem.

What happens next

User error protection is the next family and the one that decides how costly an operability failure is.

Source

ISO Online Browsing Platform, free preview of ISO/IEC DIS 25000-23.2 https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso-iec:25000:-23:dis:ed-1:v2:en read 22 October 2026

ISO/IEC 25010:2023, Product quality model https://www.iso.org/standard/78176.html read 22 October 2026

ISO/IEC 25023:2016, Measurement of system and software product quality https://www.iso.org/standard/35747.html read 22 October 2026

The rules this is built from

Read from the real rules, not invented.

This page is read from the public record for 6.5.4: the heading in the free contents, and where public, the text the preview carries.

  • Read from the real rules
  • 63 record pages behind it
  • 116 public headings checked
  • Check any line yourself

The measure set is read from the public contents; the model table is read from the public 25010:2023 model. Where the draft text is not public, the page says so instead of filling the gap.

Nothing here is guessed while you wait. Each page is written from the public record and points to the exact page it came from. Record updated 22 October 2026