23ISO 25000-23Part 23 measurement record

Home / The record / 6.5 Interaction capability measures

ISO/IEC DIS 25000-23.2, 6.5.3 ยท Heading only

6.5.3 Learnability measures

Learnability asks how easily a user can learn to use the product. A measure relates learning effort or successful first use to the users and tasks studied.

The free preview lists this heading and its subheadings but not the requirement text. This page states what the heading requires in our words and never invents the wording.

Not legal advice; does not certify. This page states our reading of a public draft, not the standard's wording, and it is not an official interpretation.

What this heading covers

Learning can be measured by time to competence, by the proportion of users who complete a task on the first attempt, or by the help needed to get there. Each is legitimate and they answer different questions. The population and the starting knowledge matter: an expert user learns a new product faster, and a study of experts says little about new users. The measure should name the task, the user group and the definition of learned that was used.

Record position: family 10 of 40 in clause 6, under 6.5 Interaction capability, which carries 8 families. It is one of the 40 families a programme has to map its measures to, and its elements are listed below. The heading is 6.5.3 in the public contents; the text behind it is not public.

How a measure for this family is built

Count users who reached the defined competence on the first attempt as the numerator over the users in the study. If effort is the quantity, measure the time or the number of help requests to reach competence and report the median with the spread. Keep the task simple and representative, and record prior experience.

Our worked formula

Users who reached the defined competence on the first attempt divided by users in the study, with the task and prior experience recorded.

Measure elements that can feed it

Number of users, Duration, Number of tasks, Number of user actions

Chosen by us from the thirty-one quality measure elements named in Annex B. The draft does not publish which elements feed learnability, so the choice above is a worked example, not the draft's assignment.

What to put in place before publication

  1. Define competence before the study, not after seeing the results.
  2. Record prior experience for each participant.

Evidence to keep

KindWhat it looks like
Competence ruleThe definition of learned and the task used to test it
Attempt recordThe attempt, the help used and the time for each user

The test a reviewer asks

  • Is learned defined, or is the result a satisfaction rating?
  • Does the study include users new to the product?

Two questions to ask

  • How was learned defined before the study?
  • Were any participants already trained on the product?

Where teams usually fall short

  • A learnability score from a training session the participants had already attended.

What the number cannot tell you

It cannot tell you how much help they needed. Two users can both reach competence, one alone and one with a trainer, and the measure treats them the same.

What happens next

Operability is what a user does once the product is learned. The two measures often diverge.

Source

ISO Online Browsing Platform, free preview of ISO/IEC DIS 25000-23.2 https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso-iec:25000:-23:dis:ed-1:v2:en read 22 October 2026

ISO/IEC 25010:2023, Product quality model https://www.iso.org/standard/78176.html read 22 October 2026

ISO/IEC 25023:2016, Measurement of system and software product quality https://www.iso.org/standard/35747.html read 22 October 2026

The rules this is built from

Read from the real rules, not invented.

This page is read from the public record for 6.5.3: the heading in the free contents, and where public, the text the preview carries.

  • Read from the real rules
  • 63 record pages behind it
  • 116 public headings checked
  • Check any line yourself

The measure set is read from the public contents; the model table is read from the public 25010:2023 model. Where the draft text is not public, the page says so instead of filling the gap.

Nothing here is guessed while you wait. Each page is written from the public record and points to the exact page it came from. Record updated 22 October 2026