What this heading covers
This family is about the first minute, not the first week. It covers the information a user sees before use: the description, the screenshots, the first screen, the help. The population is a group of intended users, not the product team. The measure can be collected cheaply with a short task: show the entry point and ask what the product is for and whether it fits. A high score here reduces support load and abandoned trials, which is why it belongs in a product quality report and not only in marketing.
Record position: family 9 of 40 in clause 6, under 6.5 Interaction capability, which carries 8 families. It is one of the 40 families a programme has to map its measures to, and its elements are listed below. The heading is 6.5.2 in the public contents; the text behind it is not public.
How a measure for this family is built
Take the number of users who correctly identified the product purpose and its fit as the numerator over the number asked. A stricter version times the judgement and counts only correct answers within the time. Record the users and the entry point, because a landing page and a first-run screen give different results.
Our worked formula
Users who correctly identified the purpose and the fit divided by the users asked, at a named entry point.
Measure elements that can feed it
Number of users, Duration, Number of responses
Chosen by us from the thirty-one quality measure elements named in Annex B. The draft does not publish which elements feed appropriateness recognizability, so the choice above is a worked example, not the draft's assignment.
What to put in place before publication
- Name the entry point and keep it fixed for the study.
- Ask a fit question, not only a purpose question.
Evidence to keep
| Kind | What it looks like |
|---|---|
| Stimulus | The entry point or material shown to the user |
| Response | The judgement given, whether it was correct, and the time taken |
The test a reviewer asks
- Can the result be tied to a named entry point and user group?
- Is a correct answer distinguished from a confident wrong one?
Two questions to ask
- Which entry point was shown to the users, and was it the real first screen?
- Did you ask about fit, or only about purpose?
Where teams usually fall short
- The product team asked whether the product is clear, with no intended users involved.
What the number cannot tell you
It cannot tell you whether they would still choose it after use. Recognition is the first minute, not the decision.
What happens next
Learnability is the next question: recognition gets a user in, learning keeps them.
Source
ISO Online Browsing Platform, free preview of ISO/IEC DIS 25000-23.2 https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso-iec:25000:-23:dis:ed-1:v2:en read 22 October 2026
ISO/IEC 25010:2023, Product quality model https://www.iso.org/standard/78176.html read 22 October 2026
ISO/IEC 25023:2016, Measurement of system and software product quality https://www.iso.org/standard/35747.html read 22 October 2026