23ISO 25000-23Part 23 measurement record

Home / The record / 6.5 Interaction capability measures

ISO/IEC DIS 25000-23.2, 6.5 ยท Headings only

6.5 Interaction capability measures

Interaction capability is the 2023 name for what the earlier model called usability. The draft gives it eight measure families, the largest group in clause 6.

The free preview lists this heading and its subheadings but not the requirement text. This page states what the heading requires in our words and never invents the wording.

Not legal advice; does not certify. This page states our reading of a public draft, not the standard's wording, and it is not an official interpretation.

What this heading covers

The eight families run from recognising that the product is appropriate, through learning it, operating it, being protected from error, being engaged, being included, being assisted and understanding what it is doing. Eight families is a statement in itself: interaction is not one number. The 2023 model added user controllability to this characteristic, and the draft gives it no separate measure family, so a team that needs it must define a local measure. The human factors terms, accessibility, usability and user, are defined in clause 3 and they keep these measures tied to people rather than to interface features.

Record position: characteristic 4 of 9, carrying 8 of the 40 measure families in clause 6.

What the heading asks of a team

Eight measures, not one score

A satisfaction score is not a substitute for a learnability or an error protection measure. Each family has its own evidence and its own failure mode.

People are the population

The user group, its range of needs and the context of use are part of the measure. A result from one expert user is not a result for the population.

Inclusion is measurable

Accessibility and inclusivity have measures; they are not a checklist bolted on at the end. The defined term accessibility sets the population wide.

The common confusion

Interaction capability replaced usability, and the eight families make it clear that one satisfaction score is not the characteristic. Learnability, error protection and inclusivity fail separately, and each needs its own evidence.

The measure families in this characteristic

What to put in place before publication

  1. Name the user groups and the range of needs the interaction measures cover, including people with disabilities.
  2. Choose the families that matter for this product and record why the others are out of scope this cycle.
  3. Set up the observation or test method for each chosen family, with a sample that represents the group.
  4. Define how user controllability will be measured, and label it as a local measure.
  5. Keep satisfaction and engagement evidence separate from task performance evidence.

The test a reviewer asks

  • Does every interaction result name the user group and the context of use?
  • Is there at least one measure for inclusion that is not a compliance checklist?

Where teams usually fall short

  • A single usability score from five colleagues, presented as interaction quality for the product.
  • Accessibility reduced to a scanner result, with no measure of whether people can complete a task.

What happens next

The eight family pages follow the contents order. If you can read only two, read user error protection and inclusivity: they are the two that most often expose a product everyone internally found easy.

Source

ISO Online Browsing Platform, free preview of ISO/IEC DIS 25000-23.2 https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso-iec:25000:-23:dis:ed-1:v2:en read 22 October 2026

ISO/IEC 25010:2023, Product quality model https://www.iso.org/standard/78176.html read 22 October 2026

ISO/IEC 25023:2016, Measurement of system and software product quality https://www.iso.org/standard/35747.html read 22 October 2026

The rules this is built from

Read from the real rules, not invented.

This page is read from the public record for 6.5: the heading in the free contents, and where public, the text the preview carries.

  • Read from the real rules
  • 63 record pages behind it
  • 116 public headings checked
  • Check any line yourself

The measure set is read from the public contents; the model table is read from the public 25010:2023 model. Where the draft text is not public, the page says so instead of filling the gap.

Nothing here is guessed while you wait. Each page is written from the public record and points to the exact page it came from. Record updated 22 October 2026